|
|
|
ZAGREB PUSHES THROUGH
MEDIA REFORMS
The Croatian government
wants the state broadcaster to be free of political influence.
By Dragutin Hedl in
Osijek, IWPR'S BALKAN CRISIS REPORT, NO. 224, March 7, 2001
Croatia's
largest media house, Radio-Television Croatia, HRT, will this month begin a
painful transformation, intended to free the state broadcaster of political
control. The
station, which employs over three thousand people, is extremely influential.
Latest opinion polls suggest it shapes the opinions of 80 per cent of the public.
Legislation
facilitating HRT's transformation was forced through parliament in February,
despite the opposition of the nationalist majority in the upper house. The
HDZ-dominated upper house refused to endorse the new laws, but under the
country's constitution legislation passed by the lower house comes into effect
two weeks after the latter ratifies it. For ten
years, the HDZ dictated the content and editorial policy of HRT. Since winning
parliamentary elections a year ago, Croatia's six-party coalition government has
fought a protracted battle to loosen its grip on the broadcaster. On
coming to power, the government appointed a new director, but staff recruited
during the HDZ era stayed on. The
coalition government resisted the temptation to instigate sweeping staff changes,
in order to distance itself from the Tudjman regime, which frequently undertook
such purges. But the
hands-off policy has backfired on several occasions, with editors openly siding
with the HDZ during political crises. During
the recent nationalist demonstrations in support of ex- Croatian army general,
Mirko Norac - accused of war crimes against Croatian Serbs during the so-called
"Homeland War" - HRT broadcast openly sympathetic coverage. The
government has found that living up to its pre-election promise to transform
state television into an independent public broadcaster is not at all simple. In
mid-February, HRT banned a commercial for the Split-based weekly newspaper Feral
Tribune, which had been a fierce critic of Tudjman's autocratic rule. Although
the appearance of a Feral ad on HRT would have been unthinkable when the HDZ was
in power, last month's ban indicated the old-style censorship lingers on. The
commercial cocked a snook at Croatian nationalists. Only ten seconds long, it
showed the destruction of the Old Bridge in Mostar by Bosnian Croat forces,
after which the image goes black and the words "Think about it, remember..."
appear. The
slogan harked back to a recent HDZ election poster, warning voters the "communists"
- the democratic opposition - were coming back. It used
a notorious image from 1990, which became synonymous with the tensions leading
up to break-up of the old Yugoslavia. In the photograph, federal police officers
are seen beating a Dinamo Zagreb football fan with their batons, after a home
match against Red Star Belgrade ended in a brawl. The poster's slogan was,
"Think about it, remember..." HRT
claimed the Feral ad had been banned because the black image at the end confused
viewers, who thought the programme had been interrupted. The
whole affair caused a scandal. HRT Director Mirko Galic personally apologised to
Feral saying the ban had been issued without his prior knowledge. He ordered the
commercial, which was already paid for, to appear on television as scheduled. Under
the new legislation, political influence over HRT will be greatly reduced and
possibly severed. Parliament will no longer appoint its director. The post is to
be opened to the public and a 15-strong council will make the final selection. Previously,
HRT's council was made up of politicians. Under the new system, high-profile
public and cultural figures, including journalists and members of
non-governmental organisations will staff the board. In
addition to key staff changes, HRT faces fundamental reorganisation. The huge
monolith is to be broken up into smaller, separate companies. Its three radio
stations are to be split. Two will remain in state hands, the other privatised.
The transmitter and communications departments are to form a separate division. But
there are some who believe the new legislation on its own cannot solve the
problems of political influence in public broadcasting. Damir
Matkovic, an editor at HRT and a member of Forum 21, a union of television
journalists which openly protested against political interference during the
Tudjman era, believes the absence of public scrutiny remains an enduring problem. "The
problem is that the Croatian public still has no influence because civil society
still doesn't function here," Matkovic said. "Due to this lack of
public accountability some politicians are able to edit programmes over the
phone. They merely call the editor to let him know what they want and what they
don't want to see on TV. HRT used to function this way during Tudjman's reign." Dragutin
Hedl is a regular IWPR contributor |
|