|
|
|
SENSE, South East News Service Europe 6/11/01 www.sense-agency.com
DJINDJIC IN WASHINGTON D.C.: NO PRIVILEGES FOR MEDIA VETERANS
Serbian Prime Minister denies accusations according
to which the present-day situation the Serbian electronic media find themselves
in is worse in some aspects than during the former regime. Djindjic: B92 may
receive a medal but it cannot be awarded with a TV channel for its contribution
in the struggle against Milosevic.
Washington, November 6 (SENSE) - In his address
at the Institute for Peace panel discussion, Prime Minister Djindjic described
the question on why the position of some independent media in Serbia today was
less favourable than during the Milosevic regime as "irritating".
Djindjic reminded the public that one of the first steps taken by his government
was to repeal the notorious Public Information Act and return the money paid in
fines by independent newspapers. He went on to say that independent journalists
in Serbia were assassinated, persecuted and exposed to all sorts of pressure. “As far as the electronic media are concerned, we
inherited a real chaos with more than 700 private radio and TV stations. The
question was to what to do with it to wait for the new legislation regulating
the frequency allocation which would reduce by half the number of broadcasters
and, in the meantime, offer the independent journalists' association to prepare
the draft the Public Broadcasting Act? The work on the new media legislation is
currently underway which means that no previously granted broadcasting licences
would be revoked nor new ones issued to anyone", said Djindjic going
on to say that about 2 per cent of the pro-Milosevic media were still on the
airwaves while the remaining 98 per cent were under control of the people
supporting the democratic forces in Serbia. In reply to the concrete objection of B92 and ANEM
regarding the (non)allocation of new frequencies, Serbian Prime Minister said
the following: “Some are demanding privileges. They don't want a new law,
but a licence which would enable them to become a national TV channel, even
though they've got their own TV channel without proper broadcasting licence.
Consequently, their broadcasting operations are illegal… However, we accept
that because all others (independent electronic media) operate in the same way
in Serbia. Some independent journalists have voiced their criticism loud and
clear, but we, as the government, cannot do anything either in the positive or
negative sense with respect to the journalists. We have no legal basis to exert
pressure on the independent media, or, for that matter, any other media in
Serbia. We do not finance them nor do we have a law in place to do anything
against the media. The only thing we actually do is not to grant privileges to
some media. Some of them are our friends, but now, we have a new system in
Serbia which should grant everyone an equal access to national resources. If
someone was extremely courageous during the Milosevic era, we'll give him a
medal, but not a TV channel. Channels will be granted to broadcasters through
public competition for frequency allocation and everyone will compete on equal
terms as others. I'm sorry, but this is the mainstay of democracy and market
economy". Slobodan Pavlovic source: MHxJU |
|