|
|
|
SUPPORT PROGRAMME FOR INDEPENDENT
MEDIA IN SERBIA IN 2001
Content:I MEDIA SITUATIONII MAIN PROBLEMS AND NEEDSIII OBJECTIVES, PRIORITIES AND STRATEGYIV PROJECTS TO BE SUPPORTEDI MEDIA SITUATION
In
Serbien operieren heute rund 500 Radiostationen, 200 Fernsehsender und es
erscheinen etwa 2000 regelmässige Publikationen. Angesichts dieses Wildwuchs
und der politischen Machenschaften ist es zentral, über eine detaillierte
Kenntnis der Medienlandschaft zu verfügen, sind doch rund 90 Prozent dieser
Medien reine Unterhaltungskanäle ohne irgendwelchen Informationsgehalt. Von den
relevanten Stationen wiederum wird ein wichtiger Teil kontrolliert von den
Machteliten des Staates. Den zehn staatlichen oder regierungsnahen
Fernsehstationen mit nationalen Frequenzen stehen beispielsweise ein gutes
Dutzend unabhängiger Stationen mit lokal beschränkten Senderechten gegenüber.
Auch im Bereich unabhängiger und professioneller Medien kennt Serbien damit
aber eine Vielfalt, die weit über das hinausgeht, was wir in den angrenzenden Ländern
kennen. In den gut zehn Jahren unter Präsident Milosevic haben diese Medien
bewiesen, dass sie Herz und Hirn des gesellschaftlichen Widerstandes gegen das
Regime sind und sich auch nicht von oppositionellen Parteien vereinnahmen
lassen. Unabhängige Medien in Serbien wurden damit als Rückgrat der
gesellschaftlichen und politischen Dissidenz immer wieder zur Zielscheibe des
Regimes und für uns zu Hoffnungsträgern der Veränderung. Die verschärften Übergriffe
seitens der Regierung seit Beginn des Nato-Krieges 1999 und die anstehenden
Wahlen in der zweiten Jahreshälfte 2000 machten die Unterstützung und
Verteidigung unabhängigen Medienschaffens zur Schicksalsfrage für Serbien und
die ganze Region. Die Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien hat in ihrer Arbeit im Jahr
2000 hier einen Schwerpunkt in ihrer konkreten Arbeit gelegt. Die
Repressionen gegen unabhängige Medien und Medienschaffende waren so zahlreich,
dass sie hier auch auszugsweise nicht wiedergegeben werden können. Wir
verweisen auf die Berichte auf unserer Homepage, in denen das Netzwerk unabhängiger
elektronischer Medien in Serbien ANEM detailliert Woche für Woche die aktuellen
Entwicklungen dokumentiert (www.medienhilfe.ch/Projekte/FRY/
MediaReports/Reports.htm). Als Beispiel seien hier einzig die Angriffe von Vojislav
Seselj, Führer der Radikalen Partei und damals noch stellvertretender
Ministerpräsident Serbiens in Erinnerung gerufen: Mitte Februar machte er unabhängige
Medien verantwortlich für den Mord an Pavle Bulatovic,
Verteidigungsminister Jugoslawiens, bezeichnete sie als „Verräter an der
serbischen Nation“ und drohte Medienschaffenden: „Wir werden keine
Handschuhe mehr anziehen. Alle diejenigen, die für die Amerikaner arbeiten, müssen
die Konsequenzen dafür tragen. Welche Konsequenzen? Die schlimmstmöglichen.
Glaubt nicht, dass ihr überleben werdet, wenn wir umgebracht werden.“
Unterstützt wurde er dabei vom jugoslawischen Informationsminister Goran
Matic. Am 6. März stürmten Polizeieinheiten den populären und
regimekritischen Belgrader Fernsehsender Studio B, prügelten zwei
Anwesende fast zu Tode, kappten Kabel und stahlen einen Teil der Anlage. Andere
unabhängige Medien wurden mit hohen Geldbussen in den Ruin getrieben, weil sie
in ihrer Berichterstattung Angehörige der Regierung kritisierten. Am 9. Mai
wurden an einer einzigen Protestkundgebung der Opposition in Pozarevac, der
Geburtsstadt der Milosevics, 25 Journalisten verhaftet. Am 16. Mai übernahmen
die Behörden die unabhängige Belgrader TV-Station Studio B und damit
auch Radio B2-92, das auf einer Frequenz von Studio B Unterschlupf
gefunden hatte und das bis zum Umsturz am 5. Oktober nur noch über Internet
senden konnte, vor allem aber als Produktionsstudio für die anderen
Radiostationen im Netzwerk unabhängiger elektronischer Medien in Serbien
ANEM operierte. Ein anderes Beispiel für orchestrierte Übergriffe ist die
Regime-Zeitung Politika, in der OTPOR!-AktivistInnen namentlich aufgeführt
und als „nervlich labile Personen, bekannt als Straftäter“ sowie als
„Psychopaten“, „Homosexuelle“ oder „Schwarzhändler“ bezeichnet
wurden. Als
Beispiel unserer Arbeit soll hier die Unterstützung für den Journalisten Miroslav
Filipovic erwähnt werden, der vom Regime wegen angeblicher Spionage zu
sieben Jahren Gefängnis verurteilt wurde. Die Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien
engagierte sich aktiv gemeinsam mit anderen Medienorganisationen für die
Freiheit von Miroslav Filipovic und eröffnete unter dem Titel „Prime time for
Freedom“ ein spezielles Solidaritätskonto (http://www.medienhilfe.ch/News/Archiv/2000/serbia.htm).
Ein
zentrales Problem für die Printmedien war in dieser Zeit die künstliche
Verknappung der Papierversorgung durch die einzige, staatlich kontrollierte
Papierfabrik in Serbien. Über ihre Partnerorganisationen Vereinigung der
Privat-Medien und Local Press sowie in Zusammenarbeit mit
internationalen Organisationen unterstützte die Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien die
Beschaffung von Roto- und Offsetpapier, um den Zeitungen und Zeitschriften ihr
reguläres Erscheinen zu garantieren. Vor
allem im Vorfeld der Wahlen vom 24. September verschärfte das Regime seine Übergriffe
gegen Medienschaffende weiter, je deutlicher und offensichtlicher die Niederlage
der Regierungsparteien wurde. Noch am 20. September titelte die NZZ (S. 5):
„Milosevic-Regime verordnet ‚Objektivität’ – Systematische Ausschaltung
unabhängiger Medien“. Viele unabhängige Medien haben sich denn auch aus
ureigenstem Interesse aktiv an der Wahlkampagne beteiligt, indem sie die Bevölkerung
zu einer Wahl der Verantwortung aufriefen. Mit speziellen Wahlsendungen,
Wahlbeilagen in Publikationen, Plakaten, Fernseh- und Radiospots, mit
Konzerttourneen und Strassenaktionen, vor allem aber mit professioneller
Berichterstattung über die Probleme des Landes und die Perspektiven seiner
politischen Führung wurden die BürgerInnen aufgefordert, ihre Stimme zu
erheben und sich an den Wahlen zu beteiligen. Als am 5. Oktober die Bevölkerung
den Wahlsieg der Opposition dann auch auf den Strassen Belgrads gegen den
Widerstand des alten Regimes durchsetzte, waren die staatlichen Medien ein
zentrales Ziel. Das Gebäude von Radio-Fernsehen Serbien RTS wurde gestürmt
und mehrere Redaktionen von oppositionellen Medienschaffenden übernommen Die
Befreiung der Medien begann und am 10. Oktober wurde auch Miroslav Filipovic
freigelassen. Alle Anklagen und das ganze Verfahren wurden fallengelassen. Die
Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien konnte unabhängiges Medienschaffen in Serbien in
seinem Überlebenskampf gegen die brutalen Übergriffe des Regimes auch
finanziell unterstützen. Im Rahmen der dringlichen Unterstützungsmassnahmen,
die vom Stabilitätspakt für Südosteuropa beschlossen wurden, konnten wir
unseren PartnerInnen rund 560'000 Franken für konkrete Projekte zukommen
lassen. Beigetragen dazu hat vor allem auch ein sechsstelliger Betrag, den die
Schweizer Regierung sprach. Die Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien war zudem aktive
Teilnehmerin des internationalen Netzwerks, das Projekte unabhängiger Medien im
Hinblick auf die Wahlen vom September und Dezember koordinierte und finanzierte.
Insgesamt konnte die Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien für diese Wahlprojekte rund
150'000 Franken einsetzen. Ein detaillierterer Bericht über die internationale
Zusammenarbeit im Medienbereich für diese Wahlen findet sich auf unserer
Homepage (http://www.
medienhilfe.ch/News/Archiv/2000/MHint.htm). Die Situation Ende des Jahres, als die Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien eine erneute dreiwöchige Projektreise durch ganz Serbien durchführte, präsentierte sich als „Twilight Zone“, als Umbruch, bei dem das Alte nicht mehr gilt, das Neue aber noch nicht in Kraft ist. Die direkte Bedrohungssituation und die staatlichen Repressionen des alten Regimes gehören der Vergangenheit an, aber auch die neue Regierung ist nicht frei von der Versuchung, die Medien in ihren Dienst zu stellen. Während Medien, die sich in den letzten zehn Jahren ihre Unhängigkeit und Professionalität gegen das alte Regime erkämpft haben, auch gegenüber den neuen Machthabern auf kritischer Distanz bleiben, sind die alten Staatsmedien heute die neuen Staatsmedien. Bis gestern noch waren diese Medien Sprachrohr der Hetze gegen die Opposition und gegen unabhängige Medienschaffende – und von einem Tag auf den anderen abonnierten sie alle die bis gestern noch verteufelten unabhängigen Nachrichtenagenturen, strahlten Produktionen unabhängiger Stationen aus usw., um sich selbst als unabhängig zu präsentieren. Nach Jahren der politischen Entlassungen und Stellenbesetzungen, der opportunistischen Berichterstattung und regimetreuen Hofberichterstattung sind diese Medien aber zumindest vorläufig kaum in der Lage, sich unabhängig und professionell zu verhalten. Während einzelne Medienschaffende wegen ihrer offenen Unterstützung für die alten Machthaber kompromittiert sind und von ihrer Arbeit freigestellt werden, sind viele andere schlicht nicht in der Lage, selbständig zu denken und zu berichten. Die Welt aus Schwarz und Weiss besteht für sie weiterhin, nur dass der bis anhin als Strahlemann dargestellte Milosevic jetzt in dunkelstes Schwarz gehüllt wird, während Kostunica, bis gestern noch eine Unperson, heute die bisherige Rolle von Milosevic übernommen hat. Die vielen journalistischen und technischen Pannen in diesen Medien sprechen Bände. Dass da RTS-Journalisten, mit dem frischgebackenen Präsidenten Kostunica auf dem Weg nach Biarritz, ihre „Kollegen“ von Beta und Vreme wegdrängen mit dem Argument, sie hätten als staatliches Fernsehen ein Vorrecht auf ein Statement des Präsidenten, zeigt offensichtlich, wie weit es mit dieser Unabhängigkeit her ist. Die
internationale Gemeinschaft legt grosses Gewicht auf den Umbau der alten
Staatsmedien zu öffentlich-rechtlichen Medien. Im Vordergrund steht dabei der
Umbau von Radio und Fernsehen Serbiens RTS. Angesichts der riesigen Probleme
dieses Medienkolosses, der riesigen Schulden dieses Unternehmens (25 Millionen
DM alleine für nicht bezahlte Stromrechnungen), der mit rund 8500 Angestellten
aufgeblähten und professionell oft nicht qualifizierten Belegschaft, der
fehlenden gesetzlichen und wirtschaftlichen Grundlagen für den schnellen Aufbau
einer öffentlich-rechtlichen Radio- und Fernsehanstalt sowie angesichts der
politischen Druck- und Manipulationsversuche durch die neue Regierung werden
unabhängige und private Medien aber noch für einige Zeit das Rückgrat
professionellen Journalismus in Serbien bleiben. Eine Konferenz über die
Transformation elektronischer Medien vom 10.-12. Dezember, organisiert von
ANEM in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Europarat, hat hier klar Position bezogen und
Vorschläge gemacht (siehe den Beitrag von Gwyneth Henderson auf unserer
Homepage unter http://www.medienhilfe.ch/News/Archiv/2000/statemedia.htm).
Ganz ähnliche Problemberge sehen andere Staatsbetriebe wie die
Nachrichtenagentur Tanjug oder die Zeitungen Politika und Borba
vor sich. Die Mühen der Niederungen liegen da noch in weiter Ferne, der
Aufstieg hat noch nicht einmal begonnen und wird Jahre dauern, wie die
Erfahrungen aus anderen Transformationsgesellschaften (Polen, Tschechien usw.)
zeigen. Zu
warnen ist zudem vor Privatisierungen und Investitionen, bei denen die Hintergründe
unklar sind. In den letzten Wochen des alten Regimes wurden Dutzende von
ehemaligen Staatsbetrieben ehemaligen Regierungsleuten überschrieben, um so den
Einfluss der alten Politik zu sichern. Die alten Regimemedien versuchen, mittels
solcher Pseudoprivatisierungen ihre unrechtmässigen Privilegien wie nationale
Sendefrequenzen oder staatliche Investitionsleistungen in die Infrastruktur zu
retten, um sich so gegen eine gleichberechtigte Konkurrenz durch die unabhängigen
Privatmedien abzusichern. Eine fundierte Abklärung von Besitz- und Verfügungsrechten
sowie eine klare Gesetzgebung für die Vergabe von Sendefrequenzen und
Publikationsrechten ist Voraussetzung dafür, dass eine transparente und
gleichberechtige Partnerschaft von privaten und öffentlich-rechtlichen Medien
entstehen kann. Besonderes Augenmerk richtete die Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien in ihrer Projektarbeit auch auf unabhängige Medien in Minderheitensprachen. Minderheitenmedien können als Gradmesser und Schrittmacher für gesellschaftliche Toleranz und Medienpluralismus betrachtet werden. Auf die Wahlen hin wurden für konkrete Programme Medien in ungarischer Sprache in der Vojvodina und in Romanes (Sprache der Roma-Bevölkerung) in Südserbien unterstützt. Für
das Jahr 2001 wird die Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien das Schwergewicht ihrer
Unterstützungsarbeit auf den Umbau und die Umorientierung ihrer PartnerInnen für
die neuen Bedingungen legen. Print-wie elektronische Medien,
Nachrichtenagenturen und Filmproduktionen, Berufsverbände und Netzwerke, alle
werden sich im Hinblick auf die kommenden Mediengesetze und die veränderten
wirtschaftlichen, politischen und sozialen Rahmenbedingungen neu orientieren und
neu positionieren müssen. Ausbildung im Bereich Management und Marketing, aber
auch Unterstützung für die Gesetzgebungsprozesse und die weitere regionale
Vernetzung sind dabei vordringlich. Zudem werden wir besonderes Gewicht legen
auf Minderheitenmedien und spezifische Produktionen, die sich mit der
Aufarbeitung der neuesten Vergangenheit befassen, z.B. Dokumentarberichte und
Debatten über Krieg und Kriegsverbrechen, über die serbische Politik in
Bosnien-Herzegowina und im Kosov@, über Kollektivschuld und individuelle
Verantwortung. Medien in Serbien brauchen diese Unterstützung, damit das Ende
des alten Regimes auch wirklich zum Anfang der Demokratie werden kann. II MAIN PROBLEMS AND NEEDSProblems
of independent media in Serbia are not solved with the change of the authorities.
Actually, only prospective for their real development are created. Problems are
huge and complex and will need donors support in order to be properly dealt with.
In a difference to other counties in the region, independent media in Serbia
already rose in public their basic problems and needs. We briefly summarise them
as follows: 1.
The federal authorities have not done anything
in regard to media issues for four months of their rule. The work in legal
regulation of media field has not even started. A number of laws to regulate
some key issues (privatisation, registration, licenses and frequencies, PBS,
etc.) are still the ones brought by the former authorities, which do not
fulfil even minimum of required democratic standards. However, they can not
be further fully implemented because of reactions and pressure that would be put
both from international community and local public. This situation of a legal
vacuum puts media into the position of high uncertainty and postpones their
work on designing the most appropriate strategies for their future development.
Therefore, media organisations themselves, together with legal experts,
established a team who has been working on proposals of new laws in media field
(thanks to the grant from Irish Government, Medienhilfe Ex-Jugoslawien already
supports work of this tram). 2.
One of key problems is the current stage of RTS
and its transformation into a PBS. RTS is completely devastated, both in
regard to technical facilities and, even more, human resources. It is absolutely
unable to create public information programming which would meet basic
professional standards. And will not be able to do it in quite some time to
come. Currently the only one actually providing good-quality and professional
information programming are ANEM affiliates. However, a number of its
affiliates are public local broadcasters which actually belong to RTS system and
thus the new regulation of RTS will certainly have consequences on a future
composition and functioning of ANEM. The association already developed various
strategies for its transformation. 3.
Some concrete moves of the new authorities
clearly show they are keen to keep a tight control over state media. New
management and editorial leaderships of all media founded by the Federal and
Serbian Parliament as well as most of media founded by the local authorities are
appointed by the DOS and quite often are prominent members of some
party within this coalition. This is certainly a clear sign that the new
authorities actually do not want to go for real transformation of the state
media and will try their best to avoid it, postpone, or slow-down. It is obvious
that within such scenario, ANEM and RTVB92 will actually continue to play the
role of PBS. 4.
Under the strong pressure from independent media
organisations, the Federal Government, brought moratorium on issuing
frequencies till a new laws regulating this matter will be passed. Whether
the second request – that all broadcasters should be given equal chances in
tender that is expected to take place in the second half of the year – is
yet to be seen. Benevolent stance and even signs of readiness for accepting
“good services” from private broadcasters owned by formerly high officials
of the formerly ruling parties (TV Pink, BK TV, TV Palma) who, due to ties
with the former regime, gained national licenses and thus monopoly position on
the broadcast market. As award, they might preserve monopoly position they
gained under the Milosevic regime. On the other hand, there are signs that
idea to allocate national frequency to really independent and currently the most
professional broadcaster – RTV B92 – is not well seen. Accordingly,
the authorities might opt for a solution to have no national broadcaster
which is out of the government control. 5.
Also the request for putting moratorium on
foreign investments in the aforementioned broadcast monopolies till a source of
capital invested in them is checked was not fulfilled. TV Pink already sold
49% of its shares to a private company seated in Liechtenstein. Also, a certain
kind of money washing is allowed. On the other hand, decision on compensations
to independent media who were sued under the draconian Information Law and
were forced to pay extremely high punishments is not yet made. Only a very few
cases of returning the equipment seized from many independent broadcasters,
mostly ANEM affiliates, happened so far. Put together, these two processes
continue to keep privileges established during the former regime and
additionally hinder development of independent media. 6.
Although the independent media scene is in
Serbia quite developed in comparison to other countries in the region, in some
parts of the country it is extremely under-developed. Particularly important is
to emphasise that to such areas belong two particularly important: 1. south
of Serbia with Presevo valley, where the escalating inter-ethnic conflict is,
and 2. Sandzak, where an enormous inter-ethnic conflict potential exists. A
few existing independent media organisations in these areas are quite small and
operate in extremely poor conditions, lacking even basic needs being fulfilled. Vojvodina
also does not have developed independent media scene which would meet needs of
multi-ethnic society, one of its key characteristics, which its citizens managed
partly to preserve. However, one should not forget that the SSJ (the party
established by Zeljko Raznatovic – Arkan who was its president till his
assassination) scored the best results in December elections exactly in
Vojvodina. This represents danger for emerging of inter-ethnic conflicts in
forthcoming debate and decision-making processes on re-gaining Vojvodina’s
autonomy. All in all constructive role of media in conflict prevention and
conflict de-escalation needs to be properly addressed. 7.
The independent media have already started the
debate on issues relevant for their structural transformation that would
enable them to reach self-sustainability. Various approaches and strategies
have been drafted. However, one should bear in mind that this is largely
dependant on progress of developing market-economy conditions. Market-economy
is yet to be established in Serbia and the estimated current amount of
capital invested in marketing on the annual level is around 10 Mio. DM.
Which is pretty modest and quite insufficient to enable even media survival, let
alone development. III
OBJECTIVES, PRIORITIES AND STRATEGY*
1.
Objectives ·
Preservation of the development level of private
media sector and its further strengthening and rise of its level of
professionalism; ·
Making sure that the pledging of the new
authorities to guarantee freedom of media will be connected to appropriate
concrete policies in media field, including transformation of the state into
public media; ·
Ensuring country-wide access to accurate and
impartial information, free of any political manipulation or influence, to all
citizens regardless of their ethnic or religious origin; ·
Ensuring that the right of ethnic minorities to
freely develop media in their respective mother tongue is fulfilled, as one of
important measure for reaching full respect of human and minority rights and
thus contribute to progress and peace in the country; ·
Development of inter-ethnic and cross-cultural
media co-operation, both within Serbia and with media in countries with whom
Serbia was at war; ·
Providing conditions that an open public
discussion on issues related to war crimes, responsibility and guilt can be
performed. 2.
Strategy ·
Structural support to projects for media
transition, according to the following priorities: o
Projects for re-structuring and development of
management and marketing capacities, in particular of media networks and single
media organisations whose operation make a backbone of the country’s
independent media scene; o
Support to projects for development of
production capacities; o
Projects for reform of legal regulations in
media field; o
Education and training projects; ·
Structural support for establishing a
broadcaster with national frequency capable to perform professional and
responsible journalism, and which will be out of the control of the authoroties; ·
Support to media projects related to
peace-building and dealing with conflicts, with the following priorities: o
Support to independent professional media in
areas of manifested conflict (south of Serbia) or latent conflict potential (Sandzak
and Vojvodina); o
Support to independent media in minority
languagues as well as multi-ethnic and multi-lingual media; o
Support to productions of majority media related
to issues of human and minority rights as well as co-production projects with
minority media; o
Support to projects addressing traumatic burden
from a recent past, in particular issues of war crimes, responsibility and guilt; IV PROJECTS TO BE SUPPORTED
1. BROADCAST MEDIA 1.1. Network projects ANEM (Projektcode
MH2001-SER01-ANEM) – The Association of Independent Electronic Media currently
gathers 31 radio and 18 TV stations throughout Serbia, as well as a few stations
in Montenegro and BiH. It is the first,
the largest and the most successful media network in the SEE. It was ANEM,
who, by its systematic work on creating a critical public in Serbia’s
countryside through last few years, gave a key-contribution
to Serbia’s democratic changes. However, new conditions need that ANEM re-structures
and re-organises its operation in order to be self-sustainable on the market. Total
project budget is 2’615’150 US$. Grants amounting at 243’100 US$ (9.3%)
have already been provided by IREX Pro Media (360’150), EC (276’291) and
Glaser Family Foundation (44’030). The following grant are on approval: IREX
ProMedia (406’850), OSI-MNP (250’000), Dutch Foreign Ministry (122’574),
NPA (50’000) and SHC (45’000). Grant requested: 170’000
CHF (approx. 100’200 US$). Precise purpose of the grant given within the
project. ANEM Training Center
is specially treated. It is a part of the
regional project SEENMP. Around 50 courses and seminars for journalists (beginners
and advanced), digital editing, technicians, Internet radio and TV operation,
and management will be realised in 2001. Total project budget is 250’000 DEM.
Grant requested: 50’000 CHF (approx.
62’500 DEM). The project will be supported by FOS, EC and IREX ProMedia. 1.2. Particular
broadcasters RTV B92 (Belgrade)
(Projektcode MH2001-SER02-RTVB92) – Radio B92 certainly belongs to leading
independent media organisations in SEE when it comes to level of professionalism
and quality of programming. In the eve of the September elections in 2000, TV
B92 was launched. It broadcasts around a clock, with 2 hours of own production
and 1 hour of those provided by independent production organisations in Serbia.
B92’s project aims at establishing of radio and radio and TV station with a national
licence and frequency. Having a national
broadcaster which is out of control of the government is one of the
most important strategic point for future developments of the media scene in
Serbia, as well as for real democratisation of the country. RTV KRAGUJEVAC
(Kragujevac) (Projektcode MH2001-SER03-RTVKG) – This ANEM member covers with
its signal 300’000 potential audience. RTV Kragujevac applied with two
projects for TV production. The first one is the daily news broadcast in Roma
language. The project represents continuation of TV production launched
during the campaign for September elections (supported by EDA PAIIIb, through
MH), in a co-operation with local Roma NGOs. The broadcasts were met with a
great success, both by Roma community (around 15% of the population) and viewers
of Serb origin. The second project refers to TV serial of 6 broadcasts
entitled “Zastava – Yesterady, Today, Tomorrow”. There is almost no
family in Kragujevac and surrounding which did not have someone working in
Zastava auto company, once one of the biggest enterprises in former Yugoslavia.
And now not operational. This caused real social catastrophe in Kragujevac (over
40% of citizens are living on social assistance), which is nowadays called
“city of hunger”. The serial will explore various plans and possibilities
for Zastava’s eventual revival as well as for alternative economic development
strategies – the issue which is essentially linked to perspectives of
the town’s entire population. TV GRK (Prokuplje)
(Projektcode MH2001-SER04-TVGRK) – The station is among a few ANEM members
situated in the south of Serba, the area
lacking professional independent media. More over, Prokuplje is bordering
with Kosov@ and Presevo valley, which gives TV Grk a specially
important role. The station’s signal reaches 100’000 potential audience. The
submitted project relates to production of two TV serials on issues that
are striking the area the most - DPs from Kosov@ and environment
pollution - and aims at rising public awareness about and civic enagement
on these problems. RADIO OK (Vranje) (Projektcode
MH2001-SER05-RADIOK) – Radio OK has enormous strategic importance as it is the only independent broadcaster
in Pcinja district where Presevo valley belongs to. Balanced and
professional reporting is extremely important
tool in peaceful settlement of the current conflict. With own programming
and strengthened by ANEM (whose membership it applied for and whose informative
programme it already broadcasts), Radio OK can play this role. 1.3. Independent TV
productions ARCHITEL (Belgrade)
(Projektcode MH2001-SER06-ARCH) – Architel is the independent TV production
with a very special profile. It deals with issues related to short memory
syndrome, especially related to nationalist policy in Serbia during
the last 13 years as well as to issues of war crimes, responsibility and
guilt. It combines archive footage (mainly RTS) with live shooting,
interviews, or actors playing according to specially prepared screenplay. The
broadcasts are excellently done, very dynamic and go straight to the point.
Architel applied with five projects for the year 2001: four production projects
and the project for equipment upgrade (most of production equipment is
currently rented). The productions deal with 1) the role of Serbian Academy
of Science and Art in war preparation, 2) consequences of wars on
etnically-mixed families, 3) reasons and consequences of brain-drain in 90s,
mostly referring to war deserters’ issue and 4) interview serial
with prominent public personalities. All Architel production is broadcast on
ANEM stations, as well as on some other independent stations in Serbia and
Montenegro. MREZA (Belgrade)
(Projektcode MH2001-SER07-MREZA) – This independent TV production group was
established by a group of leading journalist of Studio B, after being forced to
leave the station. It
functions as private joined stuck company with 9 stuck holders, all are
journalists and none has majority in invested capital. Mreza
produces around 3 hours TV programme a week, within five broadcasts:
1) TV Network (60 minutes political magazine), 2) My Corner (15
minutes interview on the top issue of the week), 3) Days in a Week (30
minutes news review of the week), 4) Link (30 minutes weekly story
focused on actual event, phenomena or person in almost all the fields of the
social, cultural, economical and political life) and 5) Debate (60
minutes debate among studio guests on important issues). The repertoire of Mreza
is actually a classical current affairs production, which is backbone of
information programming of each TV station. Mreza’s production is
broadcast on ANEM stations, as well as other stations that have information
programme. 1.4. Minority
broadcast media FROLI TV PRODUCTION
(Nis) (Projektcode MH2001-SER08-FROLI) – Froli TV Production was the first TV
production in Roma language in Serbia. Thanks to support provided by FOS, Froli
had possibility to train its staff and now has a small but quite professional
team. Froli.s production consist of the weekly 60-minutes TV broadcast
“AKAJ RAT SI ROMANI“ (“This is Roma Night”), which is broadcast on NTV
(city station). The indicator of the importance of Frol’s work is the fact
that Nis and its surrounding have around 50’000 Roma inhabitants, while
the entire southern Serbia has around 300’000 Roma population (half of
entire Roma population in Serbia). The broadcasts has information, education
(with special focus on children and youth), and entertainment character.
It regularly promotes work of Roma NGOs (only in Nis there are 14 of them)
and opens the most important problems Roma community faces with. Froli has
no offices, it is situated in the home of its editor-in-chief. It has very
poor and outdated production equipment. There is no possibility that
Froli earns income through advertisements as it broadcasts free of charge on
NTV. Therefore it often faces lack of finances to pay running and production
costs, in which cases the staff works without any payments. Froli was very
active in election campaigns in 2000 (also supported by EDA PAIIIb) and produced
a number of TV spots and radio jingles broadcast on all ANEM stations in cities
where Roma live. RADIO NISAVA
(Nis) (Projektcode MH2001-SER09-NISAVA) – Radio Nisava is the station in a
process of establishment. It is already operational, but has only simple music
programme. However, as te ambitions are much higher: to make Radio Nisava the
first independent radio in Roma language, which would have serious programming
and will cover with the signal the whole area of the southern Serbia. Roma
NGOs in Nis already expressed interest and will to co-operate and contribute to
a good education and community programming. Based on the assessment done during
our visit to the station in December 2000, there are two priority areas. First,
to provide them decent studio and transmission equipment, and second, to
provide funds for staff’s education and training. RROMINTERPRESS (Belgrade)
(Projektcode MH2001-SER10-RROM) – Rrominterpress is the first established
Roma media house in Serbia (established 1995). There
are 37 high educated part-time employees in five editorial offices, majority of
them women (25). Every employee is computer literate and speaks at least one
foreign language. Rrominterpress
has a number of projects: newspaper (“Romano lil”), intellectual
magazine (“Roma Studies”), children magazine (“Chavrikano lil”),
Roma news service (in co-operation with BETA), three bilingual radio
broadcasts of 1.5 hours a week (in co-operation with B92 and ANEM) and
contributes to TV prodaction projects in Roma language (see project for
RTV Kragujevac). The radio shows has so far made the gratest impact on Roma
public and thus Rrominterpress wants to start a radio station “Khrlo
e Romengo” (“Voice of Roma”). The project
was initiated already in 1997, but there were no chances to realize it during
the rule of the former regime. 2. PRINT MEDIA 2.1. Network projects LOCAL PRESS
(Projektcode MH2001-SER11-PRESS) – The Association of Local Independent Media was established in 1995
and currently gathers 21 independent local newspapers throughout Serbia (including
Vojvodina and Sandzak), ranging from dailies to monthly magazines. The total
monthly circulation of the papers is around 300’000 copies. Local Press membership
criteria encompass reporting in accordance to professional journalist standards
as well as promotion of democratic values and civil society. The papers have
combination of coverage of country-wide issues and concrete economic, social,
political and other problems in their respective communities and surrounding
areas. They play very important role in community-building and
contributing to a concept of a good governance by influencing accountability
of local authorities. The Association members gave a significant
contribution to democratic changes in Serbia, especially condensed and
intensively last year during the election campaigns (several projects of Local
Press were also supported by EDA PAIIIb). 2.2. Particular
papers MALE NOVINE
(Belgrade) (Projektcode MH2001-SER12-MALE) – At present there is NO decent
specialised children magazine in Serbia. Male novine was launched in 1997
and was issued as weekly in 10’000 copies till mid 1998. Due to very poor
financial conditions of the publisher, it turned in December 1998 into a monthly
and seized to exist in 1999. With the support from SHC (EC funds), the paper was
revived in the end of 2000. Male novine seeks donors support for their annual
costs in 2001 and is sure that with development of market economy can be self
sustainable (as in other countries children consumers will hopefully be
attractive for companies). The magazine has a high quality and has strong
education concept presented on creative way attractive for 8-14 years old
children. Its special aim is to create tolerance, introduce cultures
around the world, develop children’s reading habit as addition to
their compulsory education as well as to create consciousness regarding
children’s rights and introduce the basic of democracy. 2.3. Minority papers JEHONA (Bujanovac)
(Projektcode MH2001-SER13-JEHONA) – Jehona is the only independent media in Albanian language
in the area of Bujanovac, Medvedja and Presevo, where around 100’000
Albanian minority lives. It is bi-weekly for information politics and culture.
Due to limited financial resources and to grave political situation which was
quite unfavourable for media development, it is quite small media organisation.
The paper currently appears in 3’000 copies. Its editorial policy is
oriented towards providing readership accurate and balanced information as well
as towards promoting inter-ethnic understanding (Albanian-Serb). The
paper applied with the project of its annual needs for 2001, including equipment
upgrade, office furnishing as well as production and operational costs. 3. NEWS AGENCIES BETA (Belgrade)
(Projektcode MH2001-SER14-BETA) – Beta is the oldest and the biggest independent news agency
in the SEE region. It produces around 250 news items a day, disseminated in
a several services. All independent media who have informative coverage in
Serbia and Montenegro are BETA’s users and also many media in other countries
of the region. The agency has a good co-operation with other independent
agencies, like ONASA, STINA and establishing of co-operation with KosoaLive is
on the way. BETA’s biggest problem is inability of large majority of its
clients to pay for services. Besides, BETA will need re-structuring in order
to adapt to new-created conditions and develop into a self-sustainable media
organisation.. It strategy consists of strengthening of existing but poorly
developed or starting new services that were not interesting for clients
in the past, but will get important in next future: economic, culture and
sports service, as well as photo service and audio service for broadcast media.
1. BROADCAST MEDIA 1.1. Particular
broadcasters RADIO 021 (Novi
Sad) (Projektcode MH2001-SER15-R021) – Radio 021 is the most popular
station in Vojvodina and one of the best ANEM memebers. It has excellent,
modern, urban programming encompassing variety of information, culture,
education, youth, children, and music broadcasts. The station has a number of
broadcasts promoting civil society groups (e.g. special women broadcasts
during the election campaign, the project which was supported by EDA PAIIIb), as
well as those aimed at education on human and minority rights. It is also
known for its openness for cross-border co-operation and is member of a
number of regional networking projects. 021 has quite large team of well-trained
professionals which make it one of the stations with the biggest development
potential. The station submitted two strategically important projects
which will determine its future long-term development. The first one
consists of development of the second channel (frequency obtained), which
will broadcast in all relevant minority languages in Vojvodina. The
second one relates to launching of Vojvodina-wide daily central informative
broadcast, which will be done within a network of independent local stations.
RADIO VK and VK
TV (Kikinda and Senta) (Projektcode MH2001-SER16-RTVK) – The media organisation Info Jet includes four particular media
outlets: VKTVJET, VK & VK2 Radio in Kikinda and City Radio Senta. Both
cities (Kikinda and Senta) are situated in north-east part of Vojvodina, where strong
Hungarian community lives. All stations broadcast bi-lingual and have
ethnically mixed editorial staff. These stations play important role
in development of these two communities and significantly contribute to
preservation of good inter-ethnic relations. We expect to get the project in
next days. 1.2. Independent TV
productions URBANS (Novi Sad)
(Projektcode MH2001-SER17-URBANS) – UrbaNS is the only
independent TV production in Vojvodina and the only one able to do high-quality professional broadcasts. It
consists of 20 young very educated and talented media professionals, which
make modern, dynamic broadcasts with lot of excellent footage. Both state TV
Novi Sad and ANEM TV Network rely on its information programming on
Vojvodina-related issues. The productions are especially aimed at promoting inter-ethnic
and cross-cultural dialogue and understanding and is available in Serbian
and Hungarian language. It strongly stands for Vojvodina’s traditionally
good practice of multiculturalism, which was very much destroyed during the last
decade. UrbaNS applied with projects for production of three TV weekly
broadcasts and with the separate project for equipment upgrade. 2. PRINT MEDIA VOJVODINA (Novi Sad)
(Projektcode MH2001-SER18-VOJVO) – The paper switched from a weekly into a daily during the
campaign for the September elections, which was strongly supported by donors
co-ordination (also given grant by EDA PAIIIb). It is the only independent
daily in Serbian language in Vojvodina and, due to the fact that it gathers
the best journalists, provides significantly better coverage than state
daily Dnevnik. However, the paper needs further support till it stands on its
feet. Equipment upgrading and especially development of management skills and
marketing will be the essential development points for the year 2001.
ESTABLISHING
INDEPENDENT RADIO STATION (Novi Pazar) (Projektcode
MH2001-SER19-PAZAR) – Currently there is no independent broadcast media with
information programming in Sandzak. Local public broadcasters are
under direct control of the local authorities, while private broadcasters have
only commercial and entertainment programming. The project for establishing
local independent radio station in Novi Pazar was initiated last year. It was
supposed to be carried out in a co-operation with two independent Montenegrin
stations and the programme would be actually broadcast from Montenegrin
territory into Sandzak, as there were no chances to get license for broadcasting
from the former authorities. However, the project is now re-designined
and consist of founding a station which will perform normal and fully
legal operation in Sandzak itself. *
In this chapter, only aims and strategy which are specific for Serbia will
be elaborated. Those referring to the whole area of the former Yugoslavia
are of course relevant for Serbia, but will not be here repeated. |
|