|
| |
International Crisis Group ICG:
Elections in Kosovo: Moving Toward Democracy?
7 July 2000
In the autumn of 2000, for the first time in their history, the people of
Kosovo are being promised democratic, internationally supervised local elections.
The elections are a vital step in the process of establishing a properly
functioning system of local government in Kosovo and encouraging the people of
Kosovo to take increased responsibility for their own future.
If the elections are to be successful, however, a number of complicated
political and practical problems will need to be overcome. In a new report,
entitled Elections in Kosovo: Moving Toward Democracy?,
the International Crisis Group reviews progress made to date and sets out
measures to counter corruption, hate media and intimidation.
Conduct of the Media
Media in Kosovo give few signs of adequate readiness for a major electoral
contest. Indeed, the media situation provides a microcosm of the broader
problems of society in anticipating structured and stable political changes.
Although the media report continuously on political personalities and issues,
standards of fairness are uneven.
Pristina on 1 June had seven Albanian language dailies (Rilindja, Koha Ditore,
Zëri, Bota Sot, Kosova Sot, Dita, and Epoka e Re.) A wide range of general
political weeklies and monthlies was also on sale. The entire province has 40
radio stations and five television broadcasters.
The main dailies are seen to be aligned with different political parties.
Rilindja, the former official organ of the League of Communists of Kosovo, is
now considered a semi-official voice of Hashim Thaci and the PDK. In addition,
Dita, a new and expensively produced daily, is also viewed as particularly close
to Thaci: Dita has amassed significant resources for an entry into the
television field, and is seeking a television license. Bota Sot, a newspaper
that has also been criticised by many representatives of the Albanian media
profession and the public for its habitual personal attacks, inflammatory use of
prejudicial language when discussing Serbs, and general sensationalism, leans
toward support for Rugova and the LDK.
Although daily newspapers from Albania do not circulate in Kosovo, weekly and
monthly periodicals do, and Kosovars watch broadcasts by RTV Tirana and other
non-Kosovo Albanian media as well as European channels through ubiquitous
satellite dishes. In addition, Albanian newspapers from Macedonia are sold in
Kosovo.
RTK Kosova - an internationally funded public broadcasting facility operating
out of the facilities of the old state-run Kosovo broadcast entity - presents
television and radio programs. Its television broadcasts are limited to two
hours a day because of insufficient money to pay for required additional
satellite time for more broadcasts.
Radio Kosovo's medium wave broadcasts - though considered poor quality and
therefore seldom listened to - cover virtually the entire northern part of the
Albanian-inhabited zone of the Balkans. Radio Kosovo's electoral programming
will comprise three phases: first, electoral profiles of parties, programs, and
candidates; secondly, direct news coverage of the campaign, and thirdly, as the
vote gets nearer, Western-style policy debates with restricted time for answers.
The profile broadcasts have covered all parties, including the smallest and
newest, and focussed on call-in questioning, and have been extremely successful.
Radio Rilindja - the radio broadcast arm of Rilindja, the PDK-supporting
newspaper - has the highest level of listenership in Kosovo. Radio 21 is a
popular station that is viewed as among the best media in Kosovo. Blue Sky
Radio, supported by a Swiss foundation, has high quality music programs and
broadcasts 24 hours per day, but is viewed by many Kosovars as close to UNMIK
and lacking in balance; its audience share is small.
Regional Albanian-language radio may be expected to play a major role in
municipal elections. Such stations also show political alignments; for example,
Radio Dukagjini in Pec is considered to be associated with Ramush Haradinaj of
the AAK.
Serb and minority interests are either radically underrepresented or
unrepresented. Two "weeklies" appear in Prizren in Turkish (Yeni
Dönem) and Bosnian (Kosovski Avaz), but no Serbian print media exist
indigenously. Jedinstvo, the former Serb daily in Pristina, is sold in the
Serb-controlled areas of Mitrovica and north Kosovo, but its circulation is
small.
Several Serb radio stations operate, including Radio Max, an FM broadcaster
in the village of Silova near Gjilane, whose eight employees, all Serb, have
applied for membership in the Association of Kosovo Journalists (SHGK), the
membership of which was previously exclusively Albanian. There are four other
Serb radio stations: Radio Gracanica, Radio Caglavica, Radio Kontakt Plus, and
Radio Televizija Kosovska Mitrovica (RTKM). In addition to the latter,
Serbian-language news bulletins appear on RTK Pristina television. Finally,
Radio Kontakt in Pristina operates as a multiethnic station with Serb
programming.
Belgrade television is also received throughout Kosovo. The interests of the
Serb population are also partially represented by the press in Serbia proper,
which circulates freely in Mitrovica and the northern border zone, and also
makes its way to the Serb enclaves.
Unfortunately, at present the ethnic character of Kosovo media is one of
relatively strict segregation in reporting. Albanian media present only an
Albanian viewpoint. Official media under Milosevic's control are consistently
hostile to the international community's efforts in Kosovo and their coverage of
Kosovo forms a part of Milosevic's continued strategy of destabilisation of the
region. By contrast, Serb opposition media like BLIC and DANAS, which are read
in the Serb enclaves, report with fairness and sympathy on the views of Kosovo
Serb democratic opposition figures like Bishop Artemije.
In terms of professional activity on the ground, few Albanian or Serbian
media have reporters regularly covering the "other side." Naturally,
security issues are involved here, but the result is to reduce informed coverage
of the other community. On the evening of 21 June 2000, a Serb woman journalist
employed by Radio Kontakt and her male companion were shot and wounded while
walking in downtown Pristina, highlighting the security problem.
International community media regulation has also followed two tracks,
through two successive phases. During the first year of the international
presence in Kosovo, in the print realm the international community attempted to
introduce a voluntary code but its impact was negligible. In theory, broadcast
media were more closely controlled through allocation of frequencies, but even
there international officials claimed to be able to do little more than provide
general policy guidance to broadcast media. As of 21 June 2000, only 12 of 40
radio stations were licensed, but no sanctions of any kind had been applied to
unlicensed stations.
Hate speech is present in Kosovo Albanian media, especially in the daily Bota
Sot, which has virtually institutionalised use of the ethnic slur "shkije"
for Serbs, in its headlines and subheads. Issues of incitement to violence and
the regulation of Kosovo print media were dramatised earlier this year with the
controversy over reporting by the daily newspaper Dita about a Serbian employee
of UNMIK, Petar Topoljski. In a 27 April article, Dita published a photograph of
Topoljski along with serious allegations of criminal misconduct during the war.
Within two weeks Topoljski was found dead. On 3 June 2000, UNMIK chief Bernard
Kouchner ordered the offices of Dita closed for eight days.
Dita publisher Behlul Beqaj insisted that the story was accurate and that the
fault lay with the international community for employing Topoljski. Koha Ditore
offered to print several pages per day of DITA's editorial product until the ban
ended, and the attitude of the Albanian media to the ban were typified by Koha
Ditore's headline on 4 June, the day after the suspension, which declared
"Dita is closed by decree, not through normal procedure." After the
suspension, Dita continued its defiant attitude, republishing the original
Topoljski article and following that with additional articles - including
pictures - allegedly about Serbs living in Kosovo who had engaged in violent
activities against Albanians during the war.
The facts of the Topoljski case itself remained obscure, with rumours flying
and little confirmed by investigators. Dita seems to have had valid grounds for
concern about the UN employment of an individual with an alleged background of
questionable activities during the war. It also appears that international
authorities may have failed to pursue these concerns when Dita raised them
informally. But by presenting these issues in an article in which Topoljski was
identified with a photograph, along with a description of his employment - in
contrast with the Albanian witnesses in the story, who were identified only by
initials - the handling of the matter by Dita amounted to an incitement to
violence against Topoljski.
Before the Topoljski incident the international community had largely sat on
its hands regarding the issue of media regulation. A proposed scheme for media
supervision was developed in August 1999. At that time, OSCE invited seven
Kosovo residents to form a Media Policy Board to advise OSCE, which would retain
final regulatory power over the media. The seven-member board would have
included one Serb and six Albanians, the latter comprising human rights
activists and intellectuals, as well as journalists. The plan was withdrawn
after a leak of information on the plan led to protests against alleged
censorship from media watchdog groups. Regulations regarding the allocation of
frequencies to broadcast media were largely ignored, resulting in a
proliferation of unlicensed broadcasting.
As a substitute for international regulation, the international community
attempted - with no success - to encourage self-regulation by Kosovo journalists
themselves. A professional Code of Conduct was produced by the Association of
Journalists of Kosovo. This code, however, was apparently never formally adopted,
the "Court of Honour" it called for was never created or used, and its
provisions had no discernible impact on the behaviour of the Albanian media.
The Dita case revitalized determination in the international community to
address the issue of media regulation in Kosovo. On 21 June 2000, OSCE chief
Everts unveiled regulations governing the conduct of broadcast and print media.
The new rules created a Temporary Media Commissioner (TMC) with the task of
implementing a regulatory regime for all media in Kosovo, pending the
establishment of an Interim Media Commission. The media commissioner was
authorized to issue binding Codes of Conduct for print and broadcast media. For
violations of the regulations or the codes by either broadcast or print media
the TMC was authorized to employ a range of tough but graduated sanctions
including warning, fines of up to 100,000 DM, seizure of equipment, and
suspension of operations. An appeals process is established in both areas.
Sensitivity to the aftermath of the Dita case was shown in sections of the
regulations titled "Special Provisions," which specifically forbade
"publishing personal details of any person, including name, address, or
place of work, if the publication of such details would pose a serious threat to
the life, safety or security of any such person through vigilante violence or
otherwise."
The Codes of Conduct were not made public at the time the regulations were
announced. Drafts of the codes (dated 25 June 2000) established broad but vague
standards for both broadcast and print media. In both codes journalists, editors,
broadcast managers and other media personnel were required to:
Respect the needs of citizens for "Useful, timely and relevant
information" and to respect individual rights;
Avoid "unnecessarily or baselessly provoking or inflaming public opinion"
and avoid writing, publishing, or distributing material that "by its
content or tone" would incite ethnic or religious hatred, crime, or carry a
clear risk of "public harm," defined as "death, injury, damage to
property or other violence;"
Meet generally accepted standards of civility and respect for the ethnic,
cultural, and religious diversity of Kosovo;
Factually report crimes, violence, and natural disasters while avoiding
sensationalism and showing consideration for privacy;
Strive to ensure accuracy, fairness, and impartiality;
Distinguish "commentary from news;"
Avoid exclusively or primarily promoting the interests of one political party;
Avoid writing, publishing or distributing false or deceptive material; and Avoid
derogatory language about individuals or groups.
The new OSCE regulations are well intentioned and aimed at addressing serious
problems in the Kosovo media. But the drafts of the codes available to ICG set
vague but sweeping standards - with the force of law - that would appear to make
it possible to penalise a broad spectrum of reporting that falls well short of
hate and incitement to violence. The codes should be tightened to make legally
punishable only carefully defined media activity, of a kind that has the likely
effect of stimulating ethnic hatred or inciting violence. Provisions intended to
encourage internationally accepted standards of journalistic conduct, such as
objectivity, accuracy, and respect for privacy should be retained as goals, with
implementation here left to beefed-up professional organisations of journalists,
established on a firm institutional footing with OSCE backing. The provision
banning media support for political parties goes significantly beyond hate
reporting and incitement and should be eliminated; media organs should have the
right to support a political party if they wish.
Another troubling aspect is the open-ended nature of the regulations in terms
of time. Although international officials involved in developing the regulations
have said they are intended to be temporary, the print media regulation is to
remain in effect pending establishment of "effective self-regulation by the
print media in Kosovo," an event uncertain in both time and content, and
which in any case is left entirely up to the UN to decide. The broadcast
regulation is of open-ended duration. Some regulation of broadcast licensing and
allocation of frequencies is obviously necessary on a permanent basis but the
broad provisions of the code as it now stands are too restrictive.
Limited government regulation of media content in Kosovo is justified in the
immediate post-conflict period, and while the region's media is becoming
re-established, but it must not be allowed to become a permanent feature of the
Kosovo media environment. Under no circumstances should the international
community hand over to Kosovo government authorities, who have only limited
experience in democracy, a ready-made tool for putting the media in a
straightjacket.
With virtually every aspect of media behaviour to be regulated - and
potentially restricted and punished - by the international community, monitoring
of the Kosovo print and broadcast media will have to be comprehensive, timely,
and accurate. Up to now, media monitoring by the international community has
been a mixed bag. Both OSCE and the UN maintain separate, and often duplicative,
media monitoring operations. UNMIK media monitoring is considered by most
consumers to be the best in quality and quantity, although it distributes
translations of only a fraction of the stories appearing every day in the print
media. Broadcast monitoring is reported in a very sketchy fashion. OSCE media
monitoring is somewhat slower and less comprehensive that that of UNMIK. It
would make sense for UNMIK and OSCE to combine - or at least co-ordinate - their
media monitoring efforts in order to ensure that potentially punishable material
is brought before the appropriate authorities in a timely fashion. Failing to
distinguish and act on important stories was dramatically seen in the Topoljski
case when the offending Dita article elicited no response from policy makers in
the international community at the time of its publication, going unnoticed
until after Topoljski's death.
Also troublesome is the status of the Temporary Media Commissioner. In
introducing the new regulations, OSCE chief Daan Everts described the
independence of the Commissioner as "crucial." According to the
regulations, however, the Commissioner is appointed by the UNMIK chief and there
is nothing in the regulations to define his status or to protect his
independence. Kosovo needs someone to provide appropriate supervision to its
media but the individual chosen to exercise this heavy responsibility should be
a senior, respected international figure who is both genuinely independent and
possesses broad journalistic experience.
A regulatory structure governing expression in both print and electronic
media could have a constructive impact on the development of Kosovo self-rule,
but the current one should be promptly recast in favour of one including the
following principles:
The structure must be temporary, ideally limited to one year or to a period
ending a month after the conclusion of the first Kosovo-wide general election;
It must be administered by an independent figure of international stature with
journalistic experience and statutorily independent of outside interference by
international authorities in Kosovo or the countries involved in the Kosovo
mission; It must be limited to specific activities, such as hate reporting,
unfounded allegations of criminal behaviour, incitement to ethnic violence, and
incitement of political violence through hateful attacks on individuals and
political tendencies; and Kosovar journalists should be drawn into its
administration to the greatest possible extent.
|